Legal Opinion

Steffes v. Steffes

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1997No. Civil 960188PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Judy Steffes appeals from an amended judgment crediting Allen Steffes for some post-majority child support that had been withheld from his income under a withholding order. We hold Allen was not obligated to pay post-majority child support whenever the contingencies specified in the parties’ stipulated divorce decree were not satisfied, and he was entitled to a credit for some of the post-majority support withheld from his income. We hold, however, he was not entitled to a pro rata credit for the children who did not satisfy those contingencies, and we remand for further…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wagner v. WagnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Geinert v. GeinertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Heinz v. HeinzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Logan v. BushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API