Legal Opinion
INTTERRA, LLC v. THE ANALYTICAL MOOSE LLC and RACHAEL BRADY
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 22, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00747Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 INTTERRA, LLC, No. 2:26-cv-00747-WBS-CSK 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING 15 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THE ANALYTICAL MOOSE LLC and PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 16 RACHAEL BRADY, 17 Defendants. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 This action commenced on March 5, 2026, when plaintiff 21 Interra, LLC (“Intterra”) filed a complaint seeking declaratory 22 and injunctive relief requesting this court to, among other 23 things, declare that its use of its “AWARECA” mark does not 24 infringe upon…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.