Legal Opinion

Network Automation, Inc. v. Advanced Systems Concepts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 2011No. 10-55840PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

“We must be acutely aware of excessive rigidity when applying the law in the Internet context; emerging technologies require a flexible approach.”

Brookfield Commc’ns, Inc. v. West Coast Entm’t Corp., 174 F.3d 1036, 1054 (9th Cir.1999).

Network Automation (“Network”) and Advanced Systems Concepts (“Systems”) are both in the business of selling job scheduling and management software, and both advertise on the Internet. Network sells its software under the mark AutoMate, while Systems’ product is sold under the registered trademark AetiveBatch. Network decided to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Rearden LLC v. Rearden Commerce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. JL Beverage Co. v. Jim Beam Brands Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. La Quinta Worldwide LLC v. Q.R.T.M., S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API