Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 2005No. 2005-0365PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Thomas Herbert Freeman, of Norwalk, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0007852, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1975.

{¶ 2} On December 1, 2003, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The parties waived a hearing, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline considered the cause on the parties’ joint stipulations of fact and misconduct. The panel made findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the board adopted, and a recommendation, which the board modified.

Miscond…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BooherOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Sarver.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. LockshinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. ParisOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HartkeOhio Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API