Legal Opinion

Seifert v. April

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1935No. File #44606; #44607Published

1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.

The original writ names as defendants, Morris April, X. April and Y. April, doing business under the firm name of Morris April £•? Brothers and Helms M. Morrell, all of Bridgeton, N. J., and Carl T. Ralph of Bridgeport, Conn.

Service on the defendants Morris April, X. April and Y. April, as also, the defendant, Morrell, was attempted to be made under the provisions of General Statutes, Sec. 5473.

The sheriff’s return shows that after having served the defendant Ralph, he left with the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles “four true and attested copies for the following defendants:” (naming the Aprils…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API