Legal Opinion

Tutino v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 16, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The plaintiff recovered damages for the loss of an eye in a common law action. At the time of the accident, he was employed as a machinist. He was drilling a hole in some concrete when a particle entered his left eye. He was treated in first aid rooms established by the defendant and was attended by nurses and a physician also in its employ. The basis of the action was the improper manner in which the defendant had performed its duty to furnish proper medical and surgical treatment, and because of the lack of skill and training of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laubheim v. De Koninglyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot MaatschappyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. O'Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Quinn v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Eighmy v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. South Florida Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Terhune v. Margaret Hague Mat. Hosp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Ernest Lee Lindsay v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Van Meter v. E. R. Morehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Beadling v. SirottaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Claus v. BrodheadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API