Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1895PublishedCited by 26 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBbaed., J.

One Quinn, the intestate of plaintiff in error, was an employe of defendant, and was seriously crushed by the driving wheel of one of" its engines while engaged in the discharge of his duty as switchman in the yards of the railroad at Holly Springs, Miss. Immediately after the injury, he was taken in charge by a surgeon employed by the defendant to render .surgical attention to such of its employes as were injured at that place while in its .service. He at once placed himself in communication by wire with the chief surgeon of the railroad, whose duty, under his employment, was to render…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Laubheim v. De Koninglyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot MaatschappyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Robinson v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  4. Mound City Paint & Color Co. v. ConlonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Andrews v. BoedeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Powers v. Massachusetts Homœopathic HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  2. Nidiffer v. Clinchfield RailroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Moody v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Kellogg v. Church Charity FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. Odle's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API