Legal Opinion

Beadling v. Sirotta

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 4, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

71 N.J. Super. 182 (1961)

176 A.2d 546

GEORGE BEADLING, PLAINTIFF,

v.

E. BERNARD SIROTTA AND SAMUEL LANGSTON COMPANY, A N.J. CORP., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided December 4, 1961.

For Motion — Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink (by Mr. Charles McGeary), attorney for defendant Langston.

For Motion — Messrs. McCord, Farrell & Eynon (by Mr. Sidney P. McCord), attorney for defendant Sirotta.

Contra — Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting (by Mr. Martin Haines), attorneys for plaintiff Beadling.

WOOD, J.C.C.

This case is before the court upon the separate motions of the defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Miklos v. Liberty Coach Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Jessey v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Tutino v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Beadling v. SirottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API