Beadling v. Sirotta
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
71 N.J. Super. 182 (1961)
176 A.2d 546
GEORGE BEADLING, PLAINTIFF,
v.
E. BERNARD SIROTTA AND SAMUEL LANGSTON COMPANY, A N.J. CORP., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided December 4, 1961.
For Motion Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink (by Mr. Charles McGeary), attorney for defendant Langston.
For Motion Messrs. McCord, Farrell & Eynon (by Mr. Sidney P. McCord), attorney for defendant Sirotta.
Contra Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting (by Mr. Martin Haines), attorneys for plaintiff Beadling.
WOOD, J.C.C.
This case is before the court upon the separate motions of the defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Sokolay v. EdlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Miklos v. Liberty Coach Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Jessey v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Tutino v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Beadling v. SirottaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Patricia Franza v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014