Legal Opinion
Claus v. Brodhead
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 9, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. Super. 598 (1955)
116 A.2d 725
GEORGE F. CLAUS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WILLIAM F. BRODHEAD AND UNION MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 9, 1955.
Messrs. Rothbard, Harris and Oxfeld (Mr. Howard Goldberger, appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.
Messrs. Green and Yanoff (Mr. Leo Yanoff appearing), attorneys for defendant.
WAUGH, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
The corporate defendant moves for summary judgment in its favor (although the notice of motion seeks summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff); or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Powers v. Massachusetts Homœopathic HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Panettieri v. CV Hill RefrigerationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Dymburt v. RaoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995