Legal Opinion

Pace Consultants, Inc. v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1984No. TC 121463, CA A22747, SC 29609PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*592CARSON, J.

In this case, we specifically are asked to decide whether the names and addresses of employers against whom unlawful employment practice complaints have been filed, and whose names and addresses were provided to defendants by complainants, not discovered through investigation, are “investigatory information relating to [a] complaint filed under ORS 659.040” and thus exempt from disclosure under Oregon’s Public Records Act (ORS 192.410 - 192.500).1 The question involves interpretation of the “investigatory information” exception (ORS 192.500(1)(h)) to the full disclosure requirements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Cox v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jordan v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. City of Portland v. RiceOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Portland v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding TeamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API