Legal Opinion

State v. Lemieux

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 9, 1983No. 1 CA-CR 5926, 1 CA-CR 6277-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Presiding Judge.

In this consolidated appeal and petition for review of the trial court’s denial of relief sought in a petition for post-conviction relief, petitioner-appellant (hereinafter appellant) asserts:

1. that his pleas of guilty were not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered because of his mistaken belief that probation was a viable sentencing alternative; and

2. that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant an evidentiary hearing concerning his belief that probation was a viable sentencing alternative.

The record in this case reveals that appellant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Broncucia v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. GeigerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. PritchettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. State v. AllenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stanley v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. SasakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API