Legal Opinion

State v. Freeland

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 89-1111, 1 CA-CR 89-1628PRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Chief Judge.

In a collision caused by an intoxicated driver, the victim’s injuries were enhanced because he was not wearing his seat belt. In this combined appeal and petition for review, we consider among other issues whether the victim’s failure to wear a seat belt constitutes an intervening, superseding cause that relieves the intoxicated driver of criminal responsibility for the victim’s enhanced injuries. We conclude that it does not.

I

On March 28, 1987, while attending a baseball game, defendant drank at least five beers. After the game, while driving a car at the posted…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. McAfeeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. RojersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. StewartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API