State v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Judge.
The appellant, Arthur Hill, pleaded guilty to the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced on July 23, 1976, to a term of not less than nine and one-half to not more than ten years. In this appeal he argues first, that the plea was the result of coercion, second, that he was not properly advised of the minimum prison sentence which could be imposed in the event he was denied probation, and third, that there was an inadequate factual basis for the plea. We remand for further proceedings in connection with the first two issues raised by appellant.
The case…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Waley v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Nickels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- State v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. LemieuxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1983