Legal Opinion

Vergote v. K Mart Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1987No. Docket 91003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Before: MacKenzie, P.J., and Allen and M. J. Shamo, * JJ. Allen, J.

This action for damages and specific performance arising from defendant’s breach of contract to purchase twenty-three acres of a 101-acre parcel of land owned by plaintiffs in Macomb County returns to us pursuant to Vergote v K mart, 125 Mich App 48; 336 NW2d 229 (1983), lv den 417 Mich 1100.39 (1983). That opinion held that evidence of oral statements was admissible to determine the threshold question of whether paragraph 10 of the original contract to purchase, as amended following a closing meeting February 1,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Nag Enterprises, Inc v. All State Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Central Transport, Inc. v. Fruehauf Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Estates of Thompson v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Reed v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Roberts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State-William Partnership v. GaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. VanDeventer v. Michigan National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API