Legal Opinion

Webb v. . Webb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The court below correctly ruled that plaintiff was entitled to maintain her action here for unpaid installments of alimony decreed under the Louisiana judgment (Lockman v. Lockman, 220 N. C., 95, 16 S. E. [2d], 670), and that the North Carolina statute of limitations, rather than the Louisiana statute of prescription, applied. Arrington v. Arrington, 127 N. C., 190, 37 S. E., 212; Clodfelter v. Wells, 212 N. C., 823, 195 S. E., 11.

However, it appears from the plaintiff’s testimony that certain payments made to her by the defendant’s intestate were not credited upon tbe amounts now claimed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arrington v. Arrington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Clodfelter v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Lockman v. LockmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Combs v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sayer v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Willard v. RodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API