Legal Opinion

Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. Appleyard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1953No. 739PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The note in question having been executed in the State of Texas, the substantive rights of -the parties are subject to the lex loci. However, since the plaintiff has instituted an action in this jurisdiction for the enforcement of its substantive rights against the defendant, its remedial rights are governed by the lex fori. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, section 103, page 104; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, section 603 (1934); 53 C.J.S., Limitations of Actions, section 28, page 972; Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co., 345 U.S. 514, 97 L. Ed. ......, 73 U. S. Rep. 856; Sayer v.…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  3. McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Little v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Parker v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Broadfoot v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Payne v. ClaffyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API