Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. Appleyard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
The note in question having been executed in the State of Texas, the substantive rights of -the parties are subject to the lex loci. However, since the plaintiff has instituted an action in this jurisdiction for the enforcement of its substantive rights against the defendant, its remedial rights are governed by the lex fori. McIntosh, North Carolina Practice and Procedure, section 103, page 104; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, section 603 (1934); 53 C.J.S., Limitations of Actions, section 28, page 972; Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co., 345 U.S. 514, 97 L. Ed. ......, 73 U. S. Rep. 856; Sayer v.…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Little v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Parker v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Broadfoot v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Payne v. ClaffyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.