Willard v. Rodman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The defendant contends the court below was without authority to enter judgment upon the admissions of his counsel. This contention is without merit. Moreover, it was admitted in this Court by counsel for defendant that the defendant owes the plaintiff the amounts alleged to be due her in the complaint and for which judgment was entered below. Nor was it suggested by counsel that the defendant has a meritorious defense to the action. Therefore, under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution of the United States, the plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment for the past due and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Picker v. VollenhoverOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Allman v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Corley v. CorleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Laughridge v. LovejoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951