In Re the Personal Restraint of Habbitt
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We granted discretionary review in these cases to decide a single issue: What is the proper remedy when firearm findings under RCW 9.41.025 are found to have been erroneously applied to enhance first degree robbery convictions? We hold that the proper remedy is to remand the cause for resentencing.
In State v. Workman, 90 Wn.2d 443, 584 P.2d 382 (1978), we held that the enhanced penalty provision of the Uniform Firearms Act, RCW 9.41.025, could not be applied so as to impose an additional penalty on one found guilty of attempted first degree robbery. Since the defendants in Workman were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CarleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LouxWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Brooks v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TheroffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Matter of Personal Restraint of DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.