Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1979No. 46215PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter involves a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the action of the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles in unilaterally changing an illegal sentence. The trial court dismissed the petition for writ of habeas corpus and Division Three of the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal.

It appears from the records herein that the sentencing judge expressly ordered that the petitioner's sentence was to run concurrently with a previously imposed sentence. By doing so, the sentencing judge clearly intended to show the petitioner some leniency. However, it is undisputed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PringleWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In RE McNUTT v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. LouxWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In RE DILL v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of CallWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. SmissaertWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API