Klamath Irrigation District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge.
On August 31, 2005, this court granted, in part, and denied, in part, the parties’ cross motions for partial summary judgment in this case, rejecting plaintiffs’ property-based claims and holding that their rights, as they exist, are properly cognizable as contract claims. See Klamath Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 67 Fed.Cl. 504 (2005). On October 21, 2005, plaintiffs filed a “Motion to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal or, in the Alternative for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b).” Briefing on that motion has been completed.
Generally speaking, in order for a party to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Lea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.