Legal Opinion

Estate of Harold Stuller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 26, 2016No. 15-1545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAH, District Judge.

Wilma Stuller and her late husband, Harold, bred Tennessee Walking Horses on their horse farm in Tennessee. 1 They incorporated the horse-breeding operation as L.S.A., Inc., and claimed its substantial losses as deductions on their tax returns. But the IRS determined that the horse-breeding was not an activity engaged in for profit and so assessed taxes and penalties against the Stullers. The IRS also penalized the Stullers for failing to timely file their 2003 return. After paying up, the appellants, Wilma Stuller, Harold’s estate; and LSA, sued the government for a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Native American Arts, Inc. v. Peter Stone Co., U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Roberts v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. RedwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  5. Cedant v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API