Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 2016No. 15-3396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The Internal Revenue Code allows a taxpayer to deduct “all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business.” 26 U.S.C, § 162(a). But if the activity giving rise to the expenses “is not engaged in for profit,” section 183 permits deduction .of expenses incurred in the activity “only to the extent that the gross income derived from such activity [i.e., the not-for-profit activity] for the taxable year exceeds the deductions.” 26 U.S.C. § 183(a), (b)(2). The activities governed by section 183 are usually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter Faulconer, Sr. And Mary T. Faulconer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Jackson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Estate of Harold Stuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Denise Celeste McMillan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  2. Omar v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Scott A. Householder & Debra A. Householder v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  4. Waite v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API