Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Work
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, United States Magistrate.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Lladro S.A. is a Spanish corporation, which manufactures porcelain products, including porcelain figurines. The figurines are manufactured in accordance with designs prepared by Disenos Artísticos E Industriales S.A. (“DAISA”), another Spanish corporation. DAISA owns copyrights, both U.S. and foreign, on many of the Lladro figurines. Weil Ceramic & Glass, Inc. (“Weil”), a New Jersey corporation, imports and distributes these figurines in the United States and allegedly owns the United States trademark rights and the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Pittston Co. v. Allianz InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Hydraflow, Inc. v. Enidine Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Fox v. California Sierra Financial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.