Legal Opinion

Weil Ceramics & Glass, Inc. v. Work

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 19, 1986No. Nos. 83 CV 4149, 84 CV 1964PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, United States Magistrate.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Lladro S.A. is a Spanish corporation, which manufactures porcelain products, including porcelain figurines. The figurines are manufactured in accordance with designs prepared by Disenos Artísticos E Industriales S.A. (“DAISA”), another Spanish corporation. DAISA owns copyrights, both U.S. and foreign, on many of the Lladro figurines. Weil Ceramic & Glass, Inc. (“Weil”), a New Jersey corporation, imports and distributes these figurines in the United States and allegedly owns the United States trademark rights and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  4. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Cuno, Inc. v. Pall Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. Pittston Co. v. Allianz InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  4. Hydraflow, Inc. v. Enidine Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
  5. Fox v. California Sierra Financial ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API