Legal Opinion
Landaas v. Canister Co. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 26, 1951No. 10360, 10361PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This case involves suit for unpaid overtime compensation provided by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. The court below allowed the claimants the compensation claimed, denied liquidated damages and interest and awarded attorneys’ fees. D.C.N.J. 1950, 91 F.Supp. 620. Both sides appeal. There are five questions in the case.(a) The first and most important question is whether the employees are entitled to overtime rates on hours over forty each week applied to what was called an “attendance bonus.” This depends upon whether the “attendance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Michigan Window Cleaning Co. v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Wheaton Glass Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- General Electric Co. v. Porter. Porter v. General Electric CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Ivey Ivey v. Foremost Dairies, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.