Legal Opinion

Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 8, 1946No. 186PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. It does not follow that, merely because each side moves for a summary judgment, there is no issue of material fact. For, although a defendant may, on his own motion, assert that, accepting his legal theory, the facts are undisputed, he may be able and should always be allowed to show that, if plaintiff’s legal theory be adopted, a genuine dispute as to a material fact exists. As judgment here was ,on plaintiff’s motion, we must therefore decide whether, adopting its legal theory, there was no such dispute. We are satisfied there was none.

2. We take it as admitted that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New YorkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Begnaud v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  5. Rose Schwabenbauer v. Board Of Education Of The City School District Of The City Of OleanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API