Legal Opinion

Continental Cas. Co. v. Pinkston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 28, 2006No. 1041327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Continental Casualty Company ("Continental") petitioned this Court, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., for permission to appeal from the denial of its motion for a partial summary judgment. This Court granted Continental permission to appeal. After reviewing the record and considering the arguments presented by the parties, we conclude that permission to appeal under Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the appeal. See Hughes Beverage Co. v. Hughes,861 So.2d 1087 (Ala. 2003); State v. Bassett,364 So.2d 1175 (Ala. 1978).

Facts and Procedural History

John Clifton…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CahoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. National Insurance Association v. SockwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. St. Paul Mercury Ins. v. Chilton-ShelbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Governor Siegelman v. Alabama Assn., S. Bds.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Johnson v. First Acceptance Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  4. Phillips v. National Security Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Bronner v. BurksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API