Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Gore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 2008No. 1070491PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Progressive Specialty Insurance Company (“Progressive”) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Gerald Gore and his wife, Jeanette Gore, in a declaratory-judgment action commenced by Progressive to determine its obligation, if any, to pay uninsured-motorist benefits under an automobile policy issued to Gerald Gore. We affirm.

I. Factual Background

The dispositive facts are undisputed. On November 13, 2002, Jeanette Gore completed an application to purchase automobile insurance from Progressive. The application contemplated that the policy would be issued solely in the name of Gerald Gore,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Holloway v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Star Freight, Inc. v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Pinigis v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Nance v. Southerland, 2080746 (ala.civ.app. 1-29-2010)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. GoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API