Legal Opinion

Horn v. Guaranty Chevrolet Motors

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1969No. Civ. 9099PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

Action against car dealership for rescission, quasi-contraetual recovery and exemplary damages predicated upon fraud.

On March 15, 1966, plaintiff Gary Horn, and his wife, Sharon visited defendant’s place of business, a Chevrolet automobile dealership in Santa Ana, for the purpose of looking at and considering the purchase of an automobile. During the course of this visit, plaintiff observed a 1965 Chevrolet Impala which he eventually purchased from defendant. The ear was shown in defendant’s new car showroom and was represented by defendant as a “new” ear. The ear’s odometer showed four miles.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API