Legal Opinion
People v. Clinton
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided November 14, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lee Cross, J.
Defendant moves for dismissal of the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 30.30. That motion is denied. A major issue *556raised in this case is whether speedy trial time should be charged as to all counts in an accusatory instrument when only some of the counts in that instrument have been converted to an information.
Defendant was arraigned on January 7, 1991 on charges of leaving the scene of an incident (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [1] [a]), assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]), resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30), criminal possession of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CaussadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. MinorAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1989
- People v. ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. LopezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
- People v. KhachiyanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
- People v. QuilesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
- People v. DavinoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
- People v. VikenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.