Legal Opinion
People v. Viken
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided February 28, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph A. Grosso, J.
The defendant was originally charged in a felony complaint with criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 165.45) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.05). The felony complaint was reduced to a misdemeanor complaint pursuant to CPL 180.50 on September 27, 1993 and the 90-day "speedy trial ready rule” commenced on that date (see, CPL 30.30 [5] [c]; People v Ferrara, 102 Misc 2d 253 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1979]). The charges were not fully corroborated until December 30, 1993, 93 days after…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. LiottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. PelusoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
- People v. LobiancoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003