Legal Opinion

People v. Khachiyan

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 6, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas Farber, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the misdemeanor information pursuant to section 30.30 of the Criminal Procedure Law. Because I find that more than 90 days of “chargeable” time has elapsed, the motion is granted.

Background

Defendant was arraigned on June 16, 2001 on a misdemeanor complaint charging him with driving while intoxicated and related charges. As originally drawn, the complaint alleged two “TPO’s” (time and place of occurrence). The first “TPO,” allegedly occurring at 10:00 p.m. on June 15, 2001 on Coney Island Avenue, was based on information supplied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. SantosNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DorilasAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
  2. People v. WilsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
  3. Cabrera v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. People v. FeliciaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  5. People v. Fuller-GistCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API