Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel L. Eakman, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 12, 2004No. 03-1835PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SHADUR, District Judge.

Federal prisoner Samuel L. Eakman (“Eakman”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 2 motion that seeks the vacation or amendment of his prison sentence. Eakman claims that his current sentence is constitutionally invalid because the district judge relied on a mistaken understanding of the law in believing that the Bureau of Prisons (“Bureau”) had the discretion to place him in a community corrections center (also known as a “halfway-house”), when in fact the Bureau lacked such authority under the law. 3 On the record before…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. PettifordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Beckley v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Furnari v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Anthony HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API