Legal Opinion
Furnari v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 9, 2008No. 07-2853PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 15, 2006, appellant Christopher Furnari filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court claiming that the United States Parole Commission (“Parole Commission”) improperly had denied him parole. Furnari is serving a pre-Sentencing Guidelines 100-year sentence (five consecutive 20-year sentences) for RICO and Hobbs Act convictions related to extortion and racketeering. Since the start of his incarceration the Parole Commission has granted Furnari five parole hearings but has not ordered him…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ari Bailey v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Artie Dufur v. USPCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Toolasprashad v. GrondolskyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Terrance Alden v. Warden AllenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Mitts v. ZickefooseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.