Legal Opinion

James F. Bell v. Swift & Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1960No. 18194PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the district court erred in not requiring the defendant to answer interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff.

A lawsuit is not so rule-bound that one side wins whenever the other side breaks a rule. To succeed in an appeal based on an infraction of the rules, the appellant must show that the infraction was a substantial error prejudicing the appellant’s case. Here, it may be said that the district court erred in refusing to require the defendant-appellee to answer interrogatories the plaintiff-appellant propounded. But the error,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. United States v. Kohler Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  5. Johnston v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Pan-Islamic Trade Corporation v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. International Air Industries, Inc. And Vebco, Inc. v. American Excelsior CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Randolph C. Fernon, Jr., Etc. And Susanna F. FernonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API