Legal Opinion

Plesz v. United Technologies Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 17, 1978PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.

The defendants United Technologies Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter the defendants, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from a finding and award of the workmen’s compensation commissioner at large, acting for the first district. From a judgment dismissing the appeal, the defendants appealed to this court, assigning error in the court’s refusal to correct the finding, in the conclusions reached, and in the overruling of their claims of law.

In his finding and award filed January 3, 1976, the compensation commissioner found the following: On October 31, 1969, while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fair v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  2. Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Jacques v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Walsh v. A. Waldron & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Rosenberg v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Dos Santos v. F. D. Rich Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Soares v. Max Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API