Legal Opinion

Mead v. Tzschuck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1899No. 9693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Fawcett, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.

This is the second appearance of the case before this court. (Tzschuck v. Mead, 47 Neb. 260.) On the former hearing the decree of the district court in favor of Mead was reversed, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings therein. The second trial in the court below resulted in a decree against Mead, and he has brought the record here for review.

The opinion filed on the former hearing contains a complete' statement of the case and the questions involved, which obviates the necessity of making an extended statement at this time. The suit was instituted by Mead to foreclose a mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coburn v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Fuller v. CunninghamNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tzschuck v. MeadNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. New Omaha Thomson-Houston Electric Light Co. v. RomboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Moran v. CatlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Watters v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API