Tzschuck v. Mead
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. , References: Gould v. Evansville £ G. R. Go., 91 TJ. S., 526; Burner v. Hevener, 26. Am. St. Rep. [W. Va.], 948; Ober v. Gallagher, 3 Otto [U. S.], 199; Ward v. Todd, 103 U. S., 327; Haines v. Finn, 26 Neb., 380; Mason v. Hartford P. & F. R. Go., 19 Fed.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. , References: Gould v. Evansville £ G. R. Go., 91 TJ. S., 526; Burner v. Hevener, 26. Am. St. Rep. [W. Va.], 948; Ober v. Gallagher, 3 Otto [U. S.], 199; Ward v. Todd, 103 U. S., 327; Haines v. Finn, 26 Neb., 380; Mason v. Hartford P. & F. R. Go., 19 Fed. Rep., 55; Parker v. Ormsby, 141 U. S., 81; Morris v. Gilmer, 129 U. S., 315; Des Moines 'Navigation & Railroad Go. v. Iowa Homestead Go., 123 U. S., 552; Skillern v. May, 6 Cranch [U. S.], 267; McCormick v. Sullivant, 10 Wheat. [U. S.], 192; Holmes v. Oregon &…
1Opinion of the Court
Post, O. J.
On the 18th day of June, 1888, George W. Paul, a citizen of this state, executed to David Jamieson, *262also a citizen of this state, a mortgage upon certain real estate in Douglas county to secure the three notes of the mortgagor bearing date of October 15, 1887, amounting in the aggregate to $2,570. Paul on the 11th day of September, 1888, sold and conveyed the mortgaged property to the plaintiff in error Tzschuck by deed containing the following recital immediately following the habendum clause: “Subject to a mortgage of $2,570 given to David Jamieson under date of June, 1888, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Des Moines Navigation & Railroad v. Iowa Homestead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Blacklock v. SmallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Parker v. OrmsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mead v. TzschuckNebraska Supreme Court · 1899