Legal Opinion
State v. Lougiotis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 4, 1943PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendant was informed against for violation of the liquor law in four counts. The first count charged him with selling or delivering to a minor, contrary to the provisions of General Stat utes, Cum. Sup. 1935, § 1071c. The second and third counts alleged sales of liquor not to- be consumed on premises, contrary to the provisions of General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1939, § § 959e, 985e. The fourth count charged that the defendant kept a place which was or was reputed to be a place where alcoholic liquor was kept for sale, contrary to law (General Statutes, Sup. 1941, § 469f). The jury before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Rose v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- State v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- State v. CurtissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. TomassiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.