Legal Opinion
King v. Travelers Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover for partial disability under three policies of accident insurance issued by the defendant and covering the plaintiff as a dentist. The case was tried to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant filed a motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and contrary to the law, and from a denial of this motion has appealed. The only question raised upon the appeal is the propriety of the court’s action in denying this motion.
A motion to set aside a verdict on the ground that it is against the weight…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Canadian Radium & Uranium Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Cody v. Remington Electric ShaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.