Legal Opinion
State v. Katz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 4, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The information charged that the defendant, a permittee, sold alcoholic liquor to an intoxicated person in violation of § 1071c of the 1935 Cumulative Supplement of the General Statutes. That statute, so far as relevant to the case, provides a penalty to be imposed upon any person holding a permit to sell liquor issued by the liquor control commission who “shall sell or deliver alcoholic liquor to any minor, or to any intoxicated person, or to any habitual drunkard, knowing him to be such an habitual drunkard, or to any person after having received notice from the selectmen, as provided in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- State v. GaetanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Simmons v. HolcombSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. LammeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Hershorn v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- State v. McKennaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.