Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Raybould

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district, and from an order refusing a new trial. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Boreman, J.:

On tbe tenth March, 1884, A. K. Thornton gave bis note and mortgage to James Obipman for $500, and these were assigned to appellant. On the twenty-sixth July, 1884, appellant entered suit in first district court against Thornton to recover tbe amount of said note, and also of another *358note, and an account stated — all bona fide debts; but nothing was said about the mortgage. On the same day (twenty-sixth July, 1884) appellant obtained a writ of attachment in the same case, and said Thornton on the same day gave Chipman a power of attorney to confess judgment in that case, and on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ould v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Chapin v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Porter v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Eastman v. TurmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Ladd v. RugglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Coburn v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Coburn v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. James Pingree Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. RouseUtah Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API