Bacon v. Raybould
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district, and from an order refusing a new trial. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Boreman, J.:
On tbe tenth March, 1884, A. K. Thornton gave bis note and mortgage to James Obipman for $500, and these were assigned to appellant. On the twenty-sixth July, 1884, appellant entered suit in first district court against Thornton to recover tbe amount of said note, and also of another *358note, and an account stated — all bona fide debts; but nothing was said about the mortgage. On the same day (twenty-sixth July, 1884) appellant obtained a writ of attachment in the same case, and said Thornton on the same day gave Chipman a power of attorney to confess judgment in that case, and on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ould v. StoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Chapin v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Porter v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Eastman v. TurmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Ladd v. RugglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Coburn v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Coburn v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- National Bank of Commerce v. James Pingree Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. RouseUtah Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.