Porter v. Muller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of San Joaquin, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
—1. By the conveyance from Kroeckel to plaintiff of the former’s interest in the mortgaged premises (of the date of the 9th of November, 1876), plaintiff became tenant in common with defendant, in the lands and premises described in the complaint, the premises continuing charged with the lien of the three thousand dollar mortgage executed to plaintiff by Kroeckel and defendant on the 2d day of September, 1875.
It was found by the court below that on the 15th day of December, 1876, plaintiff conveyed the estate and interest in the land and premises, so as aforesaid conveyed by…
2Cited by12 opinions
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Rein v. CallawayIdaho Supreme Court · 1901
- Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Largey v. ChapmanMontana Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.