John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
The protests listed in the schedule, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, were consolidated for purposes of trial. They place in issue the essentiality of electric motors to certain pieces of equipment used in a chemical plant. These machines and parts thereof were classified as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, not specially provided for, under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and assessed with duty at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castelazo & Associates Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Wayne Withrow v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969