Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ford, Judge:
The protest involved herein is directed against the classification of one piece of equipment described on the invoice as “Kolbus Bookbinders Rotary Board Cutter” which was imported with *508a 220/440 volt, 60 cycle motor. Tbe collector of customs classified the merchandise under the provisions of paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55649, which provide as follows:
Articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as electric motors, fans, locomotives, portable tools, furnaces, heaters, ovens, ranges, washing machines,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arnhold Ceramics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Castelazo & Associates Atwood Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Wayne Withrow v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969