Legal Opinion

Zenz v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1917No. Sac. No. 2714. In BankPublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Review against the Industrial Accident Commission et al. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

The petitioners, alleged dependents of Frederick Albert Zenz, deceased, who received injuries in the course of, and arising out of, his employment by the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company, which caused his death, sought from the Industrial Accident Commission an award against the Railway Company under the Industrial Compensation Act. After a hearing the commission found that the injury arose out of, and happened in the course of, employment, while the injured employee was performing service growing out of and incidental thereto, in the following manner: “While delivering pouches…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. BaldwinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Antonio v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API