Legal Opinion

Bush v. Lien

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1930No. File No. 7111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

Plaintiff is a deposit creditor of the State Bank of Waubay. Defendants are stockholders of the bank. On the 8th day of October, 1926, the bank suspended; business and went into the hands of the superintendent of banks for liquidation. Plaintiff thereafter requested the superintendent of banks to commence action against stockholders to enforce the stockholders’ liability imposed by article 18, § 3, of our state Constitution and section 8993, R. 'C. 1919. The request was denied, and this action was commenced by plaintiff to enforce such liability in his favor. Defendants demurred to1 his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willis v. MabonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Way v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Smith v. OlsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Smith v. GoldsmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. TomlinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shekell v. Ypsilanti Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Belmont v. GentrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hopkins v. GlendenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sneve v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Sneve v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API