Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goldsmith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1926No. File No. 6081PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The Commercial State Bank of Salem was closed and placed in the hands of the state superintendent of banks on April 24, 1924, and thereafter and on October 3, 1924, the' superintendent- of banks, having- determined that the bank was hopelessly insolvent and that its liabilities exceeded its assets by much more than the capital stock, brought this action against defendant, who was the owner of 25 shares of stock in said bank of the par value of $2,500, to enforce her liability as such stockholder under section 3, art. 18, Constitution of South Dakota, and section 8993, Code 1919, in the amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Farmers State Bank v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bush v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Baird v. EidsvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Farmers' State Bank v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Citizens' Bank v. KastenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API