STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVER
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
11 James Edward Oliver, the respondent, was admitted to the Oklahoma Bar Association and has been practicing law in this state since 1967. He has practiced before the bankruptey courts for twenty-eight to thirty years, He is admitted in the Eastern, Western, and Northern districts of the federal court, and the U.S. Tax Court, Mr. Oliver has not had any prévious complamts or disciplinary actions,
T2 The complaint against Mr. Oliver involves a reciprocal discipline matter initiated pursuant to Rule 7, of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings. Rule 7.7(a) of those rules provides that "It…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GentrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HYDESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HYDESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. HYDESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.