Legal Opinion
Crawford v. Geiger
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 10, 2014No. Case No. 3:13CV1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge.
This is a civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following a nighttime encounter with law enforcement officers from several agencies, the plaintiffs seek damages for violations of their First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
Pending are motions to dismiss by some of the defendants. (Docs. 30, 33, 34). For the reasons that follow, I grant the motions in part and deny them in part.
Background
The events giving rise to this suit occurred, according to the complaint, the allegations of which I accept as true, e.g., Directv, Inc. v. Treesh, 487…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacob Clark v. Bernadette StoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Higginbotham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Mark Crawford v. Donavin GeigerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Crawford v. GeigerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Gaymon v. Borough of CollingdaleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.