Legal Opinion

Motorola, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 19, 1965No. 69019; protests 60/27796-11760, etc. (Chicago)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

By this action, plaintiffs seek to recover a portion of the 16 per centum ad valorem duties assessed by the collector of customs on certain magnetic earphones, under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, which provides as follows:

Articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, and articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as electric motors, fans, locomotives, portable tools,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Stoeger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Craig Panorama, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Transamerican Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. Midland International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API